The former royal was arrested yesterday by Thames Valley Police on suspicion of misconduct in public office. The allegation relates to claims that Andrew shared confidential information with Jeffrey Epstein during his time as the UK’s trade envoy between 2001 and 2011.

Under guidance from the Institute for Government, misconduct in public office typically involves the abuse or neglect of power by someone in an official role. The offence carries a maximum sentence of life imprisonment.

Andrew, 66, was detained at Wood Farm in Norfolk, where plain-clothed officers reportedly arrived in unmarked vehicles. He has since been released and has not been formally charged. He continues to deny any wrongdoing connected to Epstein.

Police investigation continues

Following the arrest, searches were carried out at Royal Lodge in Berkshire and Wood Farm in Norfolk, both located on the King’s private estate. While the Norfolk search concluded last night, officers remain at Royal Lodge.

Assistant Chief Constable Oliver Wright confirmed that an investigation is now underway.

“Following a thorough assessment, we have now opened an investigation into this allegation of misconduct in public office,” he said.

He added that authorities would seek to preserve the integrity of the inquiry and provide updates when appropriate.

King Charles responds

King Charles addressed the situation in a written statement, expressing concern while emphasising the importance of due process.

“I have learned with the deepest concern the news about Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor,” the statement read.

“What now follows is the full, fair, and proper process by which this issue is investigated.”

The King stressed that it would not be appropriate to comment further while the investigation remains active, adding that the Royal Family would continue with their duties.

Experts weigh the impact

Royal commentators have suggested that the arrest is unlikely to damage the institution of the monarchy itself.

Jonathan Dimbleby argued that the distinction between family matters and the monarchy as an institution remains crucial.

“I don’t think that it damages the monarchy,” he said. “We have to separate the notion of a family from the institution.”

Royal historian Justin Vovk echoed that view, noting that Andrew’s removal from royal duties and titles had already created distance.