Several critics questioned why the couple appeared to be receiving large crowds and attention despite no longer being working royals. “What the actual f**k is this? They are doing a pseudo-royal tour here,” one wrote.
Defenders and Context
Not all reactions were negative. Some pointed out that Meghan’s gestures — such as bending down to speak to children at eye level — are common in public engagements and not unique to any one royal.
It was also noted that Harry and Meghan continue to support charitable causes through their foundation, Archewell Philanthropies.
Questions Around Motives
Beyond body language, some experts suggested the visit may serve broader purposes. Royal commentator Giselle Bastin described the trip as a “desperate attempt to monetise their status as royalty,” adding that their current appearances resemble a “quasi-royal tour.”
She also referenced past remarks attributed to Meghan, saying: “During the 2018 tour, Meghan was overheard to say that she couldn’t believe she ‘wasn’t being paid for this’, and the irony is that this time she is coming to Australia and being paid.”
While there is no confirmed evidence that the couple is being paid for the visit itself, Meghan is scheduled to headline a luxury women’s retreat, with tickets priced up to $3,199, and Harry is set to speak at a separate summit.
A Divided Public Reaction
As the visit continues, reactions remain sharply split. While some see meaningful engagement and charitable intent, others view the tour as overly staged or self-promotional.
“It’s insulting, honestly. Crowds to meet 2 private citizens who brought nothing with them besides a camera crew,” one critic wrote.
In the end, what was meant to be a high-profile return has once again placed Harry and Meghan at the center of a familiar divide — admiration on one side, skepticism on the other.
